Sich.-Ing. Jörg Hensel Gettorf, to 18.04.2013
Free expert on occupational safety and health
Human rights defenders
i.S.d. UN Resolution 53/144
i.S.d. EU ANNEX DOC 10111-06
Bekstrasse 5a
24214 Gettorf
Germany
Tel.: 00494346413538
Fax: 004943463619336
sjhensel@googlemail.com
European Year of Citizens 2013
www.europa.eu/citizens-2013
Higher Regional Court of Munich
Nymphenburger Straße 16
80097 München
Memo:
Human rights organizations, Consulates, press etc.
Non-statutory judges in courts prohibited except Here, the criminal proceedings against Beate Zschäpe and others (NSU) method
at OLG Munich
Complaint under Article 13 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms – ECHR – for violation
Article 6 of the ECHR (fair trial) in the absence lawful judge i.S.d. Former Article 101 of the Basic Law of the Federal Republic of Germany, and in the absence of a Law based Staatsgerichtes1 – Here: Higher Regional Court of Munich Complaint for the same reasons referred to in Article 2 (3) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights of December 19, 1966 – ICCPR – infringement of Article 14 paragraph 1 sentence 1 of the ICCPR.
Judgment of the European Court of Human Rights for Violation of the commandment effectiveness (see ECHR Grand Chamber,
Judgment of 8 6 2006-75529 / 01 (Sürmeli / Germany), NJW 2006, 2389).
Ladies and Gentlemen,
As you know, the legal basis for German was State courts not only from the German Judicature Act removed but also o.a. international legal basis for courts and the legal judge is, as a result of the elimination legitimacy in this respect from the normal range of the Basic Law,
been lost. Source for the elimination of legitimacy and German dishes judge:
Article 4, paragraph 2 of the Treaty between the Federal Republic Germany and the German Democratic Republic on the
Establishment of German Unity (Unification Treaty) – EinigVtr – Unification Treaty of 31 August 1990 (Federal Law Gazette 1990 II p 889).
Thus, it is in o.a. Method obviously not law judge, rather than individuals, without a legal legitimacy, lawsuits ever perform to or may be the German population of the legal judge (former Article 101 of the Basic Law) withdrawn since the Wall came down in 1990 been so from a German independence of courts or of judicial independence for 20 years no longer can be spoken.
Note:
In connection with the o.a. Judgment of the ECtHR, I would click the Effectiveness bid in accordance with complaints. Article 13 of the ECHR through.
Quote: ECHR Grand Chamber, judgment of 8 6 2006 –
75529/01 (Sürmeli / Germany), NJW 2006, 2389:
13 ECHR (right to an effective remedy) guarantees a Remedy under state law for the enforcement of rights and freedoms of the Convention, which shall be effective. He is with him when either the alleged violation or its Prevent continuation or appropriate remedy for already the happened violations of the Convention can be obtained. If the contents of my current complaint as unfounded consider, I urge you, if this is based on actual and
legal grounds under the Administrative Procedure Act § 39 / analog standards comprehensive and detailed, as well as discretionary and error of law, and compatible with the Convention, as well as conform to the ICCPR to justify.
Should not vg. Reason within 7 days with me or with the Human rights covenant Cologne received e.V. is o.a. facts as granted viewed – § 138 ZPO / analog standards.
Jörg Hensel
