Sich.-Ing. Jörg Hensel
Independent expert for occupational health and safety
Human rights defenders
i.S.d. UN Resolution 53/144
i.S.d. EU ANNEX DOC 10111-06
Bekstrasse 5a
24214 Gettorf
Bundesrepublik Deutschland
Tel.: 00494346413538
Fax: 004943463619336
European Year of Citizens 2013
German Embassy in Baku
ISR-Plaza, 69 Nizami Str., AZ 1000 Baku
via Fax: 00994124654128
via email:info@baku.diplo.de
My letter to Mr Fatullayev from 01.02.2013
Violations of human rights in Germany in toleration of Amnesty International Germany, Human Rights Watch Germany, the German media, inter alia.
Dear Ambassador Herbert Quelle
with astonishment I have your letter to the human rights Mr Fatullayev noted, in that you speculate that it no systemic in Germany Human rights violations there. This assumption is – Ambassador – unfortunately not true.
The opposite is true and you know it!
To outsiders, it is necessary a closer behind to view the scenes, as the injury pattern of the
Countries where human rights violations more or less open come to light, differ.
In Germany, human rights abuses on a large scale veiled and “rug swept” under the.
This makes it clear to Mr Fatullayev is what is meant, are example, some elementary positions of Human rights violations in Germany led.
Judiciary
Of German dishes are the litigants hardly Delivered judgments and decisions, but – so-called –
Sham judgments and decisions issued certificate that no Signature of Judge wear, although legally
is provided, so that e.g. each policy makers, would take the to a “judicial decision” influence, it also can do so easily.
In sham judgments and decisions is a sham toPiece of paper with no legal meaning, which in the German population is increasingly communicated.
The ability to influence others to German courts in Germany anyway popular everyday. The independence of the courts is not a long time.
Violations:
Millions of people are in particular their right to a fair trial under Article 6 of the Convention for
Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms – ECHR and its right under Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of EU cheated. – In both cases, abuse of rights is gem. Article 17 of the ECHR and Article 54 of the Charter.
Torture and inhuman treatment in
German nursing homes
Every day in nursing homes over 140,000 (one hundred and forty thousand) freedom privative measures in old and dependent people vorgenommen.
Quote of Mr. Claus Fussek social worker talks to
Corinna Spies mission BR-alpha on 01/02/2013:
When it comes to human rights violations, then we are here in Germany thanks to God yes and fortunately always the First when in China or for that matter in Guantanamo happened: Please refer always happy and with a right to our past and say that such a thing never may repeat. But we have already problems, grievances here to name only. What in Amnesty International
Guantanamo or any other prison justly considered Torture refers to what we call, quite simply, “nursing shortage.” you it needs to realize some: The “Medical Service health insurance has “published it daily in German nursing homes nationwide 140000 There custodial measures like fixation, etc.! And we are silent. Outrage? Zero! The carrier of the Institutions – and here it is regardless of whether the charity to which Workers’ welfare, private organizations etc. – outraged about that scandalize the media, and speaking of cynical Individual cases or the fact that the industry is not Should provide general suspicion.
The whole conversation with: http://tinyurl.com/dylfgz7
Portrait under : http://tinyurl.com/dydjse3
Violations:
Particular violations of Article 3 of the ECHR and Article 1,3,4 and 25 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU – Prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, and rights of the elderly inter alia
Bullying in the working world
About 3000 workers / inside take annual life because of bullying at work.
Source: Deutsches Ärzteblatt – http://tinyurl.com/b53ghdq
More than 5.7 million jobs in Germany of bullying affected.
Source: Emnid – http://tinyurl.com/a4kyh25
Bullying is particularly by the European Health and safety law (RL. 89/391/EEC) and by the European Social Charter, and not by various UN conventions allowed; However, if workers’ rights, as other Human rights also entered into Germany underfoot.
Violations:
Particular violations of Article 3 of the ECHR and Article 4 the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU – prohibition of inhuman and degrading treatment, Part 1, point 2 and 3 of European Social Charter, Article 7 letter b) UN CESCR. – ICESCR, Rl. 89/391/EEC and German employment law.
Political persecution of whistleblowers,
inter alia by courts through
Compulsory admissions to mental hospitals
Intentional compulsory admissions to mental hospitals of Whistleblowers in the courts by courtesy certificates for Cover-up of crimes.
Example: Gustl Mollath, the displacement of the illicit funds uncovered for more than 7 years and always in psychiatry is still imprisoned.
Sources: The case Gustl Mollath – innocent in psychiatry
http://tinyurl.com/ca7ubvm
http://www.gustl-for-help.de
Violations:
Violations, in particular Article 1, 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 14 and 17 ECHR, Article 1, 3, Section 1, Paragraph 2 – 2 Indent, 4, 6, 7, 10 (Freedom of thought and conscience), 11, 21, 47, 48, 51,52, and 54 the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU, particularly with number 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 5.3, 5.5, 5.7, 5.9, 5.12, 5.16, 5173, 5.19, 9.1,9.4, 16.5, 16.6, 16.7, 23, and 24 of the document of the Copenhagen Meeting of the Conference on the Human Dimension of the CSCE – Copenhagen, 29 June 1990 / analog standards.
Political persecution of human rights activists
especially by courts or authorities
The Jewish human rights activist and lawyer, Dr. Garri Mourei in Application of the Directive STASI 1/762 with decomposition methods, as the regime of the former German Democratic Republic, were applied before the Wall fell, pursues. Dr. Mourei is disabled and seriously ill.
The measures consist of decomposition consistent withdrawal medical services and means of livelihood, for the especially Mr. Guntram Schneider – Minister of Labour, Integration and Social Schneider in North Rhine Westphalia – is responsible, since he is aware of everything, and related complaints under Article 13 of the Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms – ECHR also in violation of this relevant Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights on the effectiveness bid – ECtHR Grand Chamber, Judgment of 8 6th 2006 to 75529/01 (Sürmeli / Germany), NJW 2006, 2389), refuses, so the persecution of Dr. Garry Mourei can go unhindered, with the goal that Dr. Mourei goes to either their underlying disease or Germany finally voluntarily leaves. And all because Dr. Mourei in connection with the Project “The Decline of Europe” and in other places across Human rights violations in Germany reported on the Internet.
Violations:
Violations, in particular Article 1, 3, 6, 9,11, 14 and 17 ECHR, Article 1, 3, 4, 10, 11 and 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of EU ICCPR, and Article 14 of the UN – International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights of 19 December 1966 – ICCPR
Children theft (Kinderklau) by German
Youth services and family courts Using sham decisions / judgments are apparent in Germany – by the youth services – children from intact Families torn or stolen. In case you want to research facts, you Google Just the words “Kinderklau Youth Office”. How to recognize can, it is also mainly in this form of child theft for profit. – See also Kinderklau on Facebook.
http://tinyurl.com/bpegmzh
Violations:
Particular violations of Article 24 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Rights of the Child, but also against Items 1, 3, 4, 21 and 54 of the Charter, and Article 1, 3, 6 and 17 of the ECHR and Article 14 of the UN ICCPR – International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights dated December 19, 1966 – ICCPR
Organized pedophilia to sexual Satisfaction of judges and related
Protection efforts by the prosecutor – Saxony swamp
Quote Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung – FAZ
quote:
The establishment flew in 1993, but in later Questioning the women who testified to the police, two
Leipzig judges have recognized as a customer to the establishment, why the prosecutor in Dresden she libel accused.
sources:
Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung – FAZ
http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy78cmu
Saxony swamp – 28th mission contrasts June 2007
http://tinyurl.com/cpz348l
http://www.amtsmissbrauchdurchjustiz.de/55.html
Violations:
Particular violations of Article 24 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights – Rights of the Child, but also against Items 1, 3, 4, 21 and 54 of the Charter, and Article 1, 3, 6 and 17 of the ECHR.
Denial of complaints pursuant to Article 13 of the Convention for the Protection of
Human rights and fundamental freedoms – ECHR by German courts and Authorities.
German courts and authorities refuse above the citizens Remedies i.S.d. ECHR and i.S.d. Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU, by continuous, intentional reinterpretation of
Complaints under Article 13 of the ECHR into domestic Appeal. Thus, international appeal rights of a conscious Fed or ineffectiveness in particular the dignity, the inhumane treatment, the physical and mental Integrity, freedom of conscience and the freedom of expression rejected the complaint concerned objects comprising let alone remedied effectively.
The guaranteed by the Convention and the Charter civil rights ultimately by the complete disregard the hierarchy of norms flouted.
The case of the politically persecuted in Germany
Human rights activist and journalist Dmitrij Adamow are here account fully.
Even the Germanfederal judiciary operates abuse of rights i.S.d. Article 17 ECHR by also “Article 13 – Reinterprets complaints “in a national appeal and the already defiant dishes returns, with the result that the petitioner in relation to the ECHR without rights is standing there. The same applies to the highest court in Germany, the Federal Constitutional Court, which, for example, Dr.
Mourei a complaint under Article 13 of the Convention by a repellent apparent decision refused, also at willful reinterpretation into a domestic remedy, of the requirements of an appeal under Article 13 of the ECHR just not satisfied, see ECHR Grand Chamber, judgment of 8 6th 2006 – 75 529/01 (Sürmeli / Germany). – Supporting documents are available Verifiable examples to the ECHR and the EctHR defiant dishes:
Labour courts Schleswig-Holstein, Administrative Court, Land Court Muenchen I, Munich Higher Regional Courts, Federal Court, the Federal Constitutional Court, District Court of Cologne
inter alia
Violations:
Violations in particular Articles 1, 3, 6, 14 and 17 of the ECHR, Article 1, 3, 4, 10, 11, 21, 47 and 54 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU, as well as civil pact of Article 14 of the UN –
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights of December 19, 1966 – ICCPR
Elimination of the German political system (executive, Legislative, judicial) under Article 20 of the former Basic Law.
After the Berlin Wall in 1990 was theValidity determination for the Basic Law of the Federal Republic Germany from the coverage of the Basic Law secretly removed. Against this background of that date in Germany gradual dismantling fundamental rights; differently than Adolf Hitler had done during the “Kristallnacht”, can not since 1990 be said that a fundamental right bond, as The former constitution before the Wall for the State authorities have envisaged exists.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kristallnacht
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Novemberpogrome_1938
So there are in Germany, de facto, no regular courtwithin the meaning of Article 101 of the Basic Law, the former more which eliminates the state courts even in the years 1950, were, as you know. – See the history of the German Judicature Act.
Violations:
Particular violations of Security Council Resolution 217 A (III) of General Meeting on 10 December 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights and to the UN ICCPR – International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights of 19 December 1966 – ICCPR
Nazi demonstration – approval Sham resolutions or decisions without the legally required signature of a judge example of Lübeck
The city of Lübeck, the bill for illegal decisions Approval of a Nazi – demonstration, created by the last German Higher Regional Court of Schleswig-Holstein published. Another comment I save at this point.
Source: http://tinyurl.com/a9pxq5g
Violations:
Violations, in particular Article 1, 6 and 17 of the ECHR, Article 47and 54 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, Article 14 of the UN ICCPR – International Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights of 19 December 1966 – ICCPR
Amnesty International – Germany Section – Due to regular, public
Grants – in questions of Violations of human rights in Germany obviously not independent
Regarding your erroneous conjecture, Amnesty International – Section Germany – would not generous donations from receive German government, I recommend that Annual reports of Amnesty Germany appreciated.
http://www.amnesty.de/files/RB_2011.pdf
Amnesty Germany received from the state in the year 2009 345.000 Euro, in the year 2010 229.000 Euro and in 2011 247.000 Euro, which must be realized that Amnesty International before called a systemic human rights violations in Germany covers sustained by inaction.
The intervening and intemperate reaction of AI in Germany The project “The Decline of Europe” is far more than to understand:
One wants of human rights violations in Germany know nothing, at least nothing of the injuries that the German politicians would not like to see.
German Chancellor Angela Merkel, a former STASI
Spies of the GDR regime
Mr. Fatullayev should also know that the German German Chancellor Angela Merkel as a so-called
“Informal employees” with the code name “IM Erika” for State Security of the former power of the former regime German Democratic Republic (GDR) was active and the Dissident Robert Havemann spied. If you or for the Stasi past of “THE LARVA”
President of Germany, Joachim Gauck interest, I ask you to google this easily. – However, there are still many its type in “office and dignity”, the list under the this letter beyond.
sources:
Switzerland magazine – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fA-4qk1uIRM
http://www.chronik-berlin.de/news/stasi_merkel.htm
Germany remains without constitutional
In the former constitution was the German people in article 146 opens up the possibility of a constitution which, explicitly only come into existence through a popular decision allowed.
Quoted in Article 146 of the Basic Law:
Art 146
This Basic Law, according to the achievement of the unity and freedom Germany applies to the entire German people, loses his Force on the day on which a constitution comes into force
of the German people decided in a free election has been.
The political parties and institutions there have been over 40 Years “made it” until the fall of the Basic Law, the German people away this Constitution, including so that it according to the Basic Law of the Constitution. Article 146 Basic Law have equated illegally. Even in the schools this lie is to this day maintenance. Even the President of the Federal Constitutional Court Voßkuhle propagated this, obviously, so the majority of Germans not the idea comes through constitutional
People’s decision to bring or cause to want.
Quote: Voßkuhle the German constitution:
“Baptism is the German constitution in 1949 after the will of their mothers and fathers, however, not on the Name ‘constitution’, but the name ‘Basic Law’. “
Source: Legal Tribune – 06/10/2011
Violations:
Violations of Section 5.3, 7.9, 26, 40.1, 40.3 of the Document of Copenhagen Meeting of the Conference on the Human Dimension of the CSCE
Source: www.osce.org/de/odihr/elections/14304
All these reports of human rights violations in Germany are not final and can arbitrarily be continued.Including on significantly high numbers of homelessness and extreme poverty (especially old-age poverty) in Germany, the Affecting millions of people, as a consequence of the ghettoisation Commonly referred to as Agenda 2010 and Hartz IV – reforms. A reform of the Volkswagen Group launched. This is also about the child abuse has become commonplace, especially in the Catholic Church, as well as massive According violation of the rights of the child. Article 24 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU, where the children often throughout life
traumatized and the perpetrators get away with no penalties. – Of Germany accepted it. A polluter pays principle does not exist. This is also about all the tens of thousands of foreclosures without
enforceable or using illegal Judgments and decisions sham sham.
This is also about the detention of people who their debts can not pay, contrary to Article 11 of the ICCPR – International Covenant on Civil rights and obligations.
quote:
ICCPR Article 11: No one shall be arrested only because be because he is not in a position to a contractual obligation to fulfill. Resist Protocol 4 of the Additional Protocol of the ECHR, according to which imprisonment for civil claims is also prohibited. – Despite ratification are still
People arrested in this regard.
Including on human rights violations by corruption; whenever the observance of human rights prohibited is, as is, for example, to the case in the courts to the (To protect polluters especially the granting of favors or Taking advantage by omission – See in particular § § 333-340 the German Criminal Code – StGB).
In this context I also please take note Germany is the only country that virtually the Convention of
Has not ratified the United Nations against corruption.
Source: Transparency International – http://tinyurl.com/d282k2y
The Convention:
http://www.unodc.org/pdf/crime/convention_corruption/signing/Conv
ention-e.pdf
Ratifications:
http://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/treaties/CAC/signatories.html
Please also read the report of the newspaper “Die Welt” on the Complaint at the International Criminal Court in The Hague against Chancellor Merkel, for crimes against Humanity within the meaning of Article 7 of the Rome Statute THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT.
Source: newspaper “Die Welt”
German support complaint against Merkel An activist has Wuppertal display at the International
Criminal Court in The Hague filed. She speaks of a “hostile takeover” of the EU and sees crimes against Humanity.
More below … http://tinyurl.com/blsh547
For more information:
New Statesman: Europe’s most dangerous leader
Appeal to human rights organizations in Azerbaijan
Human rights organizations in Azerbaijan should
Azerbaijani government urge such called state complaint against Germany Basis of Article 33 of the European Convention for Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms in the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg appeal to the Azerbaijani population may be sometime sure that the can immense interests of Germany at the Azerbaijani Oil and natural gas, in the observance of human rights Germany itself is flanked. Finally, according to the Azerbaijani and the international public certainly not a good picture when, one regime to the mutating state, such as Germany, it is the rich oil – and gas from Azerbaijan apart and has the Azerbaijani government
known regarding the human rights violations in Germany, passive behavior and this is not clearly responsive.
Jörg Hensel
Investment: Your press release on 01.02.2013
